![]() ![]() You don't want to try to edit h.264 4K for more than a day. ![]() Why is it so much bigger than what comes out of the camera? Because it's using a compression scheme that compresses each individual frame rather than a group of pictures (GOP) so although it's larger it's much more suitable for editing purposes. If you want a higher data rate, use DNXHR HQ which is a 8-bit codec rather than HQX which is the 10-bit version as you don't have any data to put in those extra 2-bits and the higher compression rate to stuff those 2 empty bits into the codec would be useless. DNXHR SQ would be a better match for your source material. No benefit from the source material (that was lost in the camera) but you can maybe minimize any further banding issues by rendering to a higher bit rate.ģ. The only time to use DNXHR HQX might be on the final rendered output when you've applied color correction and want the benefit of rendering 8-bit sources into a 10-bit codec. No harm, but no gain and the cost is substantial and you get no benefit. This is the equivalent of putting High Octane gas in your economy car. Bigger in this case is not necessarilly better. ![]() DNXHR HQX is a 10-bit format at a much higher data rate than your recording format can achieve. The camera will record 4K internally at h.264 8-bit 4:2:0. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |